Spoiler alert: This piece discusses details from Netflix’s Sean Combs: The Reckoning. The new docuseries gives viewers an inside look at the factors behind a split verdict faced by Sean “Diddy” Combs earlier this year, with jurors sharing revealing insights that have sparked conversation among fans and followers of celebrity trials. In candid interviews featured in the series, Jurors 160 and 75 explain how the mix of testimony, evidence, and personal context influenced their decision, helping to illuminate why the jury reached a divided verdict. Importantly, the film confirms that domestic violence was not one of the charges in this case. The jurors address a striking point highlighted in the documentary — a reference to Cassie Ventura, often described as Cassie, and claims that she “wanted to be with him” — and how such statements played into the overall perception of the case. The Reckoning provides a rare behind-the-scenes look at jury deliberations, showing how individual beliefs, credibility of witnesses, and nuanced interpretations of evidence can lead to a split verdict. If you’re following true-crime and celebrity legal stories, this Netflix doc offers new context on the case, the legal strategy, and the complex personal dynamics surrounding Diddy. Watch Sean Combs: The Reckoning on Netflix to hear the jurors’ perspectives in their own words.